Saturday, December 28, 2019

charhf Character in Huckleberry Finn Essay examples

The Importance of Character in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Mark Twain’s novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is one of the world’s most acclaimed books. Twain accomplishes this with his extraordinary power of humor, his use of dialect, and by creating complex and unique characters. Developing his characters is one of the greatest assets he has in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. A character that exemplifies this most is Huck Finn, first appearing as rouge, but later transforming into a character with high moral values. Early on in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, we see Huck as a rogue figure. He jokes about killing people, and he insists that it must be fun. The idea of a gang seems good to†¦show more content†¦What did Huck care if it hurt Jim’s feelings? To Huck and the rest of the world, Jim was just a nigger. But now, Huck has surpassed society’s values and knows that Jim has feelings, too. After telling Jim the truth about the fog prank, Huck sees Jim’s feelings and sees how he hurt them. Huck says that he went and humbled [himself] to a nigger; but [he] done it, and [he] warn’t ever sorry for it either afterward, neither (Twain, 84). He saw that Jim really did have feelings. Duke and Dauphin also have a big impact on Huck’s morality. When Huck and Jim first let them on board, they agree for everybody to be satisfied, and feel right and kind towards the others (Twain, 121). This shows that Huck has changed from a boy wanting murder, rape, and pillage, to a boy that knows better and sees how important peace on a little raft can be. Once Huck finds out that Duke and Dauphin are low-down humbugs and frauds (Twain, 121), he wants nothing more to do with him. Duke and Dauphin serve as opposites to Huck on the moral spectrum. Duke and Dauphin mislead and trick people for fun and other bad reasons, while Huck mainly tricks people out of necessity. Huck shows us his dislike of Duke’s and Dauphin’s values and morals when they rejoin him on the raft. He says that he had wilted right down onto the planks (Twain, 198) when they are back on board the raft (Christensen). Once aboard on the raft again, they sell Jim. Huck’s greate st show of

Thursday, December 19, 2019

Essay on Morality in the Elizabethan Era - 1101 Words

Morality in the Elizabethan Era Values and morals of the Victorian era are quite different than those that our society upholds today. The satirical plays, A Dolls House by Henrik Ibsen, and Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw, examine the problems with certain beliefs held by the people, both men and women, of the Victorian age. Furthermore, the people in general didnt not just hold certain morals, but the different classes in the Victorian society also held their own beliefs on moral code. Of which, the middle class beliefs are most closely examined in both plays. Men and women were expected by others in Victorian society to uphold certain moral behaviors. These expectations caused many problems for the individual that upheld them†¦show more content†¦This time the women are seen expecting the man to care for them, like in Freddys case. You really are very helpless, Freddy. Go again; and dont come back until you have found a cab(Shaw 574). Because Freddy is a male, he is expected by his mother and sister to find a cab for them in the rain when there are none in sight. Even on the streets men will defend women who they dont even know. What business is it of yours? You mind your own affairs....Nice thing a girl cant shelter from the rain without being insulted,(Shaw 576). Bystanders noticing the flower girl is upset by the note taker, they defend her, if she were a man they would have expected her to fend for herself. The second requirement that makes a man a man in Victorian times is his perfect family. There they are!...Look at them, Christine! Arent they darlings?(Ibsen 19). Nora is showing off her perfect little children to her friend Mrs. Linde. Yes, take a good look at her. I think she is worth looking at. Isnt she charming, Mrs. Linde?(Ibsen 53). Torvald is now showing off his prize trophy, his wife, as if Mrs. Linde really cares. With a perfect wife and children Torvald can be seen as a true hard-working, good man. Yet, many times these seemingly good values are flawed underneath . There are many problems with these values imposed on men in Victorian times. In the case of protecting his woman, we see Torvalds true colors in the end of the play after he discovers NorasShow MoreRelatedThe Elizabethan Age: Is There a History Behind the Theater? Essay examples1668 Words   |  7 Pages There’s always history behind a theater, right? Right! The Elizabethan Theater was part of an age where body of works reign while Elizabeth I was queen (1558-1603). During the Elizabethan era, there was a mass production of inspired drama, poetry and other forms of literature, as well as growth in humanism and significantly the birth of professional theater in England. This period embodies the work of Sir Philip Sidney, Edmund Spenser, Christopher Marlowe, the well-known, William ShakespeareRead MoreHamlet1304 Words   |  6 Pagest With underlying themes of revenge, incest, and suicide, William Shakespeare’s Hamlet was remembered by many Elizabethan Era viewers as both a philosophical and oft-debated masterpiece (Dickson). These controversial themes attracted viewers everywhere, enticing them to see the play. One scene in particular from the original text of the play where this proves true is act IV, scene iv, lines 31-65, in which the titular character Hamlet decides that the time for revenge is at hand in an insightfulRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Richard IIi1258 Words   |  6 PagesShakespeare: I constructed â€Å"King Richard III† during the Elizabethan era where providential ideals of fate, divinity and God’s will were being challenged by Renaissance humanism and secularism, while Pacino here constructed his abomination in the 20th century; a strongly secular humanist time of political corruption and exploitation of individualism. Pacino: Although we have different mediums and contextual backgrounds, strong ideas of power and morality do intertextually connect both our texts, especiallyRead MoreGender Roles Of Female Characters1479 Words   |  6 PagesThroughout the eras, literature has mirrored the social changes taking place in English society specifically in regards to gender roles of female characters. The Elizabethan era, which lasted from 1558 to 1603, is often referred to as the golden age by historians where many transitions in English society regarding marriage and gender took place (Ivic 110). It was a time in which wives were viewed as the property of their husbands (Ivic 110). However, every woman was expected to marry and be dependentRead More A Comparison of Everyman and Christopher Marlowes Doctor Faustus1145 Words   |  5 PagesEveryman and Christopher Marlowes Doctor Faustus Everyman and Doctor Faustus are both Morality Plays, these are specifically plays that existed within the Medieval period. They were popular during this period as they were intended to instruct the audience in the Christian way and attitudes to life. The morality play is essentially an allegory written in dramatic form. In the fourteenth Century, morality plays were mainly based on the seven deadly sins as in everyman with each character representingRead MoreEssay about Elizabethan Theater1308 Words   |  6 Pages Elizabethan Theater Drama changed literature and theater into what it is today. I. History of Elizabethan Theater a. forming of theater 1. medieval church 2. mystery and morality b. actors 1. rogues and thieves 2. acting guilds II. Influences and people a. commanding actors 1. Shakespeare 2. Burbage b. other 1. wars of the roses (other historical influences) 2. laws restricting theater III. The theaters a. prices 1. seating 2. stage b. the theater and the globe 1. locations and characteristicsRead MoreHamlet- Shakespeare dramatises the tension between Passion and Reason1413 Words   |  6 Pagesunderlying tension. ‘Hamlet’ presents challenging representations of the traditional values of passion and reason through their varying forms. The representation of these concepts coupled with dramatic tension conflicts with traditional plots of the Elizabethan era thus creating a sense of enduring value. The various depictions of dramatized tension that underpin the play, allows issues of passion a nd reason to flourish throughout as is the intention of Shakespeare. Tension emphasises how acts of passionRead MoreChristopher Marlowe Protests: The Moral of Doctor Faustus Essay883 Words   |  4 PagesWhen Doctor Faustus was written, there was turmoil in Elizabethan society. The old medieval view made God the most important aspect of the world, while mankind and the natural world were ignored. This was giving way to the idea that mankind and the natural world were supreme. At first glance, it seems that Doctor Faustus was written with the medieval ideal in mind, however, I believe this is not so. I believe that Marlowe subscribed to the renaissance view of the world, and Doctor Faustus was intendedRead MoreClaudius as Evil in Hamlet by William Shakespeare Essay1029 Words   |  5 PagesIn Shakespeares time Ââ€" the Elizabethan era Ââ€" evil had a similar, but somewhat altered connotation in the human mind. Evil was an entity that violated the English Christian monarchial tradition. Therefore, a man such as Claudius, from Shakespeares play Haml et, a cold-blooded murderer and a ruthless manipulator, who uses rank deeds to usurp the thrown is in direct violation with the Elizabethan societal norms, and hence he is an evil character. In the Elizabethan era, the royal crown was viewedRead More Claudius as Evil in Hamlet by William Shakespeare Essay990 Words   |  4 PagesShakespeare’s time – the Elizabethan era – evil had a similar, but somewhat altered connotation in the human mind. Evil was an entity that violated the English Christian monarchial tradition. Therefore, a man such as Claudius, from Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, a cold-blooded murderer and a ruthless manipulator, who uses â€Å"rank† deeds to usurp the thrown is in direct violation with the Elizabethan societal norms, and hence he is an evil character.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In the Elizabethan era, the royal crown was viewed

Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Entrepreneurships

Question: Discussabout theEntrepreneurship. Answer: What entrepreneurial skills does Welch display? Welch was an oReferencesptimistic person because after leaving his studies he had positive feeling that he would be successful towards setting up his own business. He also had the right vision towards his future of setting the business.[1] He was an initiative person also who jus started working with a normal wage of 500. He had the power of persistence as he was self-motivated himself and was energetic towards all his work. He had the productivity power where he tried to understand the in and out of the tyre business. He was good at recognizing the strengths and weakness of the opposition and same he did with kwik- fit tyres. He also had the ability to hire people for his team so that his business grow and prosper. In-spite of hiring people he had the ability to train those people because he believed that training makes the company goes on the right path. By having such people, he well managed them also by keeping a check on them as how they are dealing with the customers and to the ir queries.[2] Then Welch tried to diversify his business through social networks by online selling of his products. Moreover, he kept a grip on his customers by having 17 call centers where he could reach to his customers and know about his satisfaction. At last, he was himself motivated to change himself without noticing about other people reactions. What lessons does this case reveal about being a successful entrepreneur? Being a successful entrepreneur does not require one to have a stable finance backup or to have the business background. It just needs a motivation and a correct vision with a right belief to do so, and the same thing happens with Michael Welch, who left school at 16 because he dint wanted to have small or medium business but something big. After getting inspired from the Kwik- Fit tyre he decided to have something like that or better than that. With little money he started to go through the ups and downs of the business from the small garages to the broken chairs, he started working and ultimately became the owner of the Black circles tyres. This shows that to achieve something big one has to pass many hurdles before getting his plan accomplished. Also to be successful one has to be knowledgeable to understand the terms of the business. What are the dangers faced by an entrepreneur when growing their business? The challenges faced by the entrepreneurs in their growing business are the flow of cash where they dont have enough money to balance their business, next is the employee hiring as it takes much of the time to recruit the people to suit the business, management of time is the most important as the entrepreneurs dont understand how to evaluate it, another one is the tasks getting delegate when the employees are not good.[3] The most important one is the strategy of marketing that how one is going to market their products which could come into the publics eyes as this is the critical point in ones growing business.[4] References Coomber, Steve. "THE DISRUPTIVE ENTREPRENEUR".Business Strategy Review25, no. 4 (2014): 70-73. Orazem, Peter F, Robert Jolly, and Li Yu. "Once An Entrepreneur, Always An Entrepreneur? The Impacts Of Skills Developed Before, During And After College On Firm Start-Ups".IZA J Labor Econ4, no. 1 (2015). Parker, K. F. "The African-American Entrepreneur-Crime Drop Relationship: Growing African-American Business Ownership And Declining Youth Violence".Urban Affairs Review51, no. 6 (2015): 751-780. Viduka, Biljana. "Young People's Perception Of Entrepreneurial Skills And Traits".Poslovna ekonomija8, no. 1 (2014): 239-258.

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Socrates Essays (976 words) - Socratic Dialogues, Dialogues Of Plato

Socrates Socrates spent his time questioning people about things like virtue, justice, piety and truth. The people Socrates questioned are the people that condemned him to death. Socrates was sentenced to death because people did not like him and they wanted to shut him up for good. There was not any real evidence against Socrates to prove the accusations against him. Socrates was condemned for three major reasons: he told important people exactly what he thought of them, he questioned ideas that had long been the norm, the youth copied his style of questioning for fun, making Athenians think Socrates was teaching the youth to be rebellious. But these reasons were not the charges against him, he was charged with being an atheist and with corrupting the youth. The charge of being impious was completely absurd because Socrates talked about the gods quite frequently and never stated to anyone that he was an atheist so it would be impossible for him to be an atheist. The charge of corrupting the youth is unjust because Socrates did not tell the youth to copy him and he is not responsible for their actions. The charges against Socrates were merely excuses by his enemies to murder him in a legal way. Socrates made his enemies by going on a search to find someone wiser than he was. Socrates went on this search because the Oracle at Delphi said he was the wisest man there was but Socrates believed that to be false (5). This lead to a futile search for a person who did have wisdom so Socrates could prove the oracle wrong. Socrates went to people who had a reputation of wisdom and then he would question and talk to them to find out if they in fact were wise. When he met someone who thought they were wise, Socrates would come "to the assistance of the god" and show him that he is not (6). When he found out that they were not wise he would tell them that to their face and by doing that make another enemy. Socrates traveled from one group to another visiting wise politicians, poets, and craftsmen, making enemies out of each group. After talking to the "wise" men Socrates realized they were all arrogant for thinking themselves wise. Because Socrates knew he was not wise he believed he was better off then them. In the end it was a representative from each group that charged Socrates with the crimes that got him condemned to death. This "occupation" consumed his leisure as well as his finances. Socrates told the court at his trail: "I live in great poverty because of my service to the god"(6). Socrates compared himself to a gadfly, and the city of Athens a steed he was just trying to stir into life (11). When a horsefly bites me I squash it, and that is exactly what the city of Athens did to Socrates. Instead of squashing him they made him drink poison, a little bit less messy. Socrates was a gadfly by questioning Athenians on subjects they rarely talked about, making them think about something they normally wouldn't. He did his questioning out in the open where Athenians congregated so the public could observe and hopefully think on whatever subject that was being talked about. Socrates would question respectable Athenians making them look stupid too a crowd, because they would not know what to say. Making the person being questioned very angry towards Socrates for putting them in such a position. Socrates made himself many enemies by going around embarrassing people in front of a crowd. Socrates believed he did what he did because of the gods and a divine sign inside of his head. Socrates had a divine sign that kept him from leaving Athens, and made him face his trail. The divine sign was a voice, not unlike a conscience. Socrates told the court that "whenever it speaks it turns me away from something I am about to do, but it never encourages me to do anything." Socrates was saying that even though his speech and demeanor antagonized the jury and aggravated their anger towards him, making the chances of them convicting him even greater. The divine sign remained silent throughout the entire process of the trial meaning that he was doing exactly what he was supposed to be doing. There was no opposition when Socrates left his home at dawn, when he entered the court, and none whatsoever during any part of his speech (15). Showing,